| Peer-Reviewed

Pre-extension Demonstration of Groundnut Technology in Babile and Fedis Districts of East Hararghe Zone

Received: 9 June 2022    Accepted: 1 July 2022    Published: 17 August 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The study was conducted at Fedis and Babile districts which are major food insecure districts found in East Hararghe Zone that due to shortage and unevenly distribution of rainfall pattern in the area to demonstrate and create awareness on improved ground nut technology. Introducing drought tolerate crops are an option to reduce food insecurity problems. Three groundnut varieties namely Shulamiz, Bable-2 and local check were demonstrated with its full packages on 10*10m2 on ten trial farmers field at Fadis and Babile districts for two consecutive years (2019-2020). Two FRGs having 30 farmers were established at both kebele. The average yield performances of the shulamiz, Babile-2 and local were 12.02, 12.02 and 7.6 quintals/ha at Bishan Bahe and 11.68, 10.44 and 7.6quintal/ha at Ballina Arba respectively. The net benefit that were obtained from Shulamiz, Babile-2 and local were 29,892, 24,312, 11,892 ETB at balina araba and 31, 422, 31,422, 11,532ETB at bishan babile respectively. Accordingly, the yield advantage of Shulamiz and Babile-2 variety over the local check were 55.1% and 46.98% over local check. While farmers’ don’t select local check because of its low yield. Finally it is better to promote Shulamiz varieties more fully on the larger scales for scale up.

Published in American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (Volume 7, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12
Page(s) 71-74
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Demonstration, Shulamiz, Fadis and Babile

References
[1] Bravo-Ureta BE, Lachaud M, Jara-Rojas R, Moreira V & Scheierling S, 2015. Water and farm efficiency: Insights from the frontier literature. Paper presented at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, 26–28 July, San Francisco CA, USA.
[2] Caliskan, S., Arslan, M., and Arioglu, H. (2008). Effects of sowing date and growth duration on growth and yield of groundnut in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. Field Crop Research, 105: 131.
[3] Cardwell, K. F., Desjardins, D. and Henry, S. H., 2004. The cost of achieving food security and food quality. (http://www.apsnet.org/online/festure/mycotoxin/top.html) (Accessed on July 1, 2012).
[4] Central Statistical Agency (CSA). Agricultural sample survey in 2009/2010. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2011.
[5] Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ & Battese GE, 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Second edition. New York: Springer.
[6] Daniel, E., 2009. Groundnut research. pp. 1-3. In: Presentation for Workshop, Werer Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.
[7] FAOSTAT. Groundnut world production; 2015.
[8] Ephrem Guchi, “Aflatoxin Contamination in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Caused by Aspergillus Species in Ethiopia.” Journal of Applied & Environmental Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 1 (2015): 11-19. doi: 10.12691/jaem-3-1-3.
[9] Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Groundnut project, unpublished production manual; 2010.).
[10] Jafer et al. Factors Affecting Groundnut Market Outlet Choice in Moisture Stress Area of Babile District, Eastern Ethiopia: Multivariate Probit Approach, International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems (IJASRT in EESs) http://ijasrt.iau-shoushtar.ac.i, ISSN: 2251-7588 Print, ISSN: 2251-7596 Online 2017: 7 (2) 91-101.
[11] Lisa Yates Nuts and Health by Nutrition Australia Victorian Division, August 2014. www.nutritionaustralia.org © 2014. The Australian Nutrition Foundation (Victoria) Inc. t/a Nutrition Australia Victorian Division.
[12] Masette M & Candia A, 2011. Increasing profitability of groundnuts in eastern agro-ecological zone, Uganda. National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda.
[13] MOARD (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development). (2010). Household Asset Building Programme. Programme Implementation Manual. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[14] Mutegi CK, 2010. The extent of Aflatoxin and Aspergillus section flavi, Penicillium spp. and Rhizopus spp. contamination of peanuts from households in Western Kenya and the causative factors of contamination. PhD dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
[15] USDA-FAS (United States Department of Agriculture-Foreign Agricultural Service), 2010. Peanut Area, Yield, and Production. Table 13. Source: www.fas.usda.gov (Accessed: 2/14/2010).
[16] Okello, DK, Biruma M & Deom CM, 2010. Overview of groundnuts research in Uganda: Past, present and future. African Journal of Biotechnology 9: 6448–59.
[17] Peanut in Local and Global food Systems Series Report No. 5, Dept. of Anthropology, University of Georgia, 2007.
[18] Smith J. S., 1989. Aflatoxin management in the warehouse. Proceeding of American Peanut Research and Educational Society 21: 63-71.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Abdulaziz Teha Omer, Kibrat Ketama Desse, Oromia Megersa Gelana, Bedasso Urgessa Wakane, Salamon Ayala Tafara, et al. (2022). Pre-extension Demonstration of Groundnut Technology in Babile and Fedis Districts of East Hararghe Zone. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 7(4), 71-74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Abdulaziz Teha Omer; Kibrat Ketama Desse; Oromia Megersa Gelana; Bedasso Urgessa Wakane; Salamon Ayala Tafara, et al. Pre-extension Demonstration of Groundnut Technology in Babile and Fedis Districts of East Hararghe Zone. Am. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2022, 7(4), 71-74. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Abdulaziz Teha Omer, Kibrat Ketama Desse, Oromia Megersa Gelana, Bedasso Urgessa Wakane, Salamon Ayala Tafara, et al. Pre-extension Demonstration of Groundnut Technology in Babile and Fedis Districts of East Hararghe Zone. Am J Eng Technol Manag. 2022;7(4):71-74. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12,
      author = {Abdulaziz Teha Omer and Kibrat Ketama Desse and Oromia Megersa Gelana and Bedasso Urgessa Wakane and Salamon Ayala Tafara and Hussein Abro Abseno},
      title = {Pre-extension Demonstration of Groundnut Technology in Babile and Fedis Districts of East Hararghe Zone},
      journal = {American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management},
      volume = {7},
      number = {4},
      pages = {71-74},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajetm.20220704.12},
      abstract = {The study was conducted at Fedis and Babile districts which are major food insecure districts found in East Hararghe Zone that due to shortage and unevenly distribution of rainfall pattern in the area to demonstrate and create awareness on improved ground nut technology. Introducing drought tolerate crops are an option to reduce food insecurity problems. Three groundnut varieties namely Shulamiz, Bable-2 and local check were demonstrated with its full packages on 10*10m2 on ten trial farmers field at Fadis and Babile districts for two consecutive years (2019-2020). Two FRGs having 30 farmers were established at both kebele. The average yield performances of the shulamiz, Babile-2 and local were 12.02, 12.02 and 7.6 quintals/ha at Bishan Bahe and 11.68, 10.44 and 7.6quintal/ha at Ballina Arba respectively. The net benefit that were obtained from Shulamiz, Babile-2 and local were 29,892, 24,312, 11,892 ETB at balina araba and 31, 422, 31,422, 11,532ETB at bishan babile respectively. Accordingly, the yield advantage of Shulamiz and Babile-2 variety over the local check were 55.1% and 46.98% over local check. While farmers’ don’t select local check because of its low yield. Finally it is better to promote Shulamiz varieties more fully on the larger scales for scale up.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Pre-extension Demonstration of Groundnut Technology in Babile and Fedis Districts of East Hararghe Zone
    AU  - Abdulaziz Teha Omer
    AU  - Kibrat Ketama Desse
    AU  - Oromia Megersa Gelana
    AU  - Bedasso Urgessa Wakane
    AU  - Salamon Ayala Tafara
    AU  - Hussein Abro Abseno
    Y1  - 2022/08/17
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12
    T2  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    JF  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    JO  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    SP  - 71
    EP  - 74
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1441
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20220704.12
    AB  - The study was conducted at Fedis and Babile districts which are major food insecure districts found in East Hararghe Zone that due to shortage and unevenly distribution of rainfall pattern in the area to demonstrate and create awareness on improved ground nut technology. Introducing drought tolerate crops are an option to reduce food insecurity problems. Three groundnut varieties namely Shulamiz, Bable-2 and local check were demonstrated with its full packages on 10*10m2 on ten trial farmers field at Fadis and Babile districts for two consecutive years (2019-2020). Two FRGs having 30 farmers were established at both kebele. The average yield performances of the shulamiz, Babile-2 and local were 12.02, 12.02 and 7.6 quintals/ha at Bishan Bahe and 11.68, 10.44 and 7.6quintal/ha at Ballina Arba respectively. The net benefit that were obtained from Shulamiz, Babile-2 and local were 29,892, 24,312, 11,892 ETB at balina araba and 31, 422, 31,422, 11,532ETB at bishan babile respectively. Accordingly, the yield advantage of Shulamiz and Babile-2 variety over the local check were 55.1% and 46.98% over local check. While farmers’ don’t select local check because of its low yield. Finally it is better to promote Shulamiz varieties more fully on the larger scales for scale up.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Fedis Agricultural Research Centre, Harar, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Fedis Agricultural Research Centre, Harar, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Fedis Agricultural Research Centre, Harar, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Fedis Agricultural Research Centre, Harar, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Fedis Agricultural Research Centre, Harar, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Fedis Agricultural Research Centre, Harar, Ethiopia

  • Sections